Why BPA Won’t Go Away

Bisphenol A (BPA) remains on top of the charts of high profile chemicals, holding this dubious distinction for several years now. We toxicologists don’t really have a top 40 but it’s obvious that this one chemical is the poster child for what can go wrong with today’s designer chemicals.

Posted on | Gary Ginsberg, PhD | Comments ()

Bisphenol A (BPA) remains on top of the charts of high profile chemicals, holding this dubious distinction for several years now. We toxicologists don’t really have a top 40 but it’s obvious that this one chemical is the poster child for what can go wrong with today’s designer chemicals. 

It’s an environmental estrogen that is tied to concerns about breast cancer, early puberty, male infertility and even obesity. It leaches out of plastic and the plasticized lining of tin cans and so epitomizes the concern that our food packaging is toxic. It brings up the “whose minding the store” question: how could a known endocrine disruptor (known since the 1930s!) be given a home in so many consumer products, including those used by babies.

Thousands of chemicals have been grandfathered into commerce since the 1970s without adequate safety testing – BPA is the ultimate example. And when tests show it might be dangerous, the system hiccups on this news.  It’s not easy to admit you are wrong, especially when you are supposed to be protecting public health.

BPA also brings up the dueling science issue where the industry-sponsored studies are 180 degrees opposite to what the university studies show. FDA and the European Union so far believe one set (industry) while other governmental bodies (Health Canada, US National Toxicology Program) take a more balanced view. And, it challenges our notion of what is a “safe” dose in that some studies suggest that even the tiniest amounts at the wrong time of development may have far-reaching effects. 

What makes this more than just an academic case study, is that our exposure continues on a daily basis; babies are exposed from their formula cans, baby bottles (if mom and dad aren’t up to speed on this) and mother’s milk (especially if she eats canned foods). Our exposure is not being monitored as there is very little testing of food and new information suggests that we may even be contacting BPA every time we touch a cash register or ATM receipt.

I guess that gives us another reason besides H1N1 to wash our hands constantly.  Apparently there will be an exposé in the December issue of Consumer Reports, with actual test data from canned foods. FDA is planning to release their Obama administration version of a BPA review any day now – the 2 Bush administration versions ended in futility and disagreement. Even if they decided right now to act on BPA, it would still take months or years for the canning industry to retool.  In fact, states that have banned BPA from canned infant formula (Connecticut and Minnesota) have done so on the slow track with phase outs of 1-2 years. Enough time for many more babies to be exposed.

BPA may not go away anytime soon but at least you can do a few things to cut down on exposure.  Think twice about eating canned anything (use homemade or dried soups for example, tomato products out of jars), give your baby breast milk and if you need to use formula, choose the powdered variety, and go BPA-free when drinking out of a water or baby bottle. While you are taking these baby steps, perhaps federal regulators will take the giant steps necessary to bring BPA and other industrial chemicals under control. 

Blog written by Gary Ginsberg, PhD
Dr. Ginsberg is a public health toxicologist whose research focuses on the unique susceptibilities of children to environmental...